Are Group Rights Justified? :: essays research papers fc

Are differentiating measures justified in the name of a assemblage rectify or eat upest or should they be condemned as violating the rights of persons to pit treatment?It has been argued that differentiating measures that grant rights exclusively to congregations are unjust as they pry on the privates fundamental right to equal treatment. This hear seeks to prove that when applied in a fair style assemblage rights can enhance the equality of treatment received by the individual.The whim that equal treatment is of vital importance and that discrimination is immoral is widespread. The reading material of equal treatment and discrimination however, is not . For some, equal treatment implies that individually individual will be treated in the exact manner all other individuals are treated. There should be no trait made between race, sex, religion or language in target to allow individuals receive preferential treatment because of their membership of a certain(a) group. O thers argue that if each person is given exactly the same rights disregardless of race, sex, religion or language then members of minorities are put at a disadvantage and equal treatment is impossible.In order to rationalize the entitlement of certain groups to exclusive rights it is important to define what the exclusive rights are. According to bread maker these rights can be divided into two groups, those pertaining to intra-groups relations and those pertaining to inter group rights. The first type of rights involves relationships between group members and may lead to individual oppression. For example if a particular religious group were given the right to legally prohibit marriages of its members to non-members this would be unjust. Individual freedom, in such a case, would be subverted for the sake of solidarity. Intra groups rights can be very treacherous to individual rights especially in theocratic and patriarchal cultures where there is a commodious danger that women wi ll be oppressed . Having established that intra-groups are potentially subversive and therefore undesirables the remainder of this essay will deal with inter group rights. Inter-group rights pertain to relationships between different groups. Inter-groups rights can, therefore, only exist in a pluralist state. Such preferential treatment seeks to protect a minority group against the larger society. The belief is that these rights will rule out the dirty advantage members of the majority group may have over members of the minority and will prevent marginilisation and segregation of the minority . These special rights can take a crap various forms.