'Hcr/210 Week 6 Checkpoint\r'

'Record Organization HCR/210 January 15, 2012 There are a few differences and similarities among sm each(prenominal), medium, and large facilities concerning the organization of patient records and in how they handle loose reports. I buzz off find that most facilities prefer that their loose records are for good anchored in their charts, which makes sense to me because it prevents the loose reports from being mislay and lost. However, the different sizes of facilities tend to organize patient tears other than according to each particular facility’s policies.\r\nThe most popular methods of organization that I have seen include chronologically, form numbers, report type, and category. During my review of the question threads, I noticed a lot of similarities and a lot of differences in how patient files are handled. For cause the medium and large facilities are by farther to a greater extent likely to use electronic files than physical composition ones, thus eliminating the threat of misplaced records. The most ordinary difference that I saw was in whether or not the facilities use paper files.\r\nIt seems that almost all of the medium and large facilities are using electronic files and everything automatically gets filed with the patient’s main file this instant. However, in small facilities they are much more likely to use paper files in which eggshell everything is filed with the patient’s main record immediately in order to make it easy to come on and to prevent it from getting lost. In conclusion, whether the facility is small, medium, or large they all take special occupy in the organization of their files whether they are paper or electronic.\r\n'