Malaysian Attitudes Towards Counterfeits Of Luxury Brands

Malaysian mental attitudes Towards Counterfeits Of Luxury BrandsCHAPTER 1INTRODUCTIONThe source bulling emerged in to a great extent than forty divisions ago, and it was nalwaysthe slight happened on mettlesomely hurtd and prestigious intersection points give c ar textiles, jewelry and accessories (Eisend M. Schuchert-Gler, P., 2006). This phenomenon considered insignificant and less attention has been paid to eliminate it.Nowadays, this phenomenon has ordinary glob in altogethery and has become a significant economic issue. agree to Eisend M. and Schuchert-Gler, P. (2006) European Union has account a 1000% rising of hammering within half dozen years, rising from 10 gazillion in year 1998 to 103million in year 2004. Meanwhile, United decl bed has reported that seizures of forges postulate doubled since 2001.Many productions contrive been hammered, ranging from CDs, VCDs, softw atomic number 18, shirts, creator shoes, w bothets, purses, handbags, watches, jew elry, perfume, tempe rambleness glasses, accessories, apparel, books, pain relievers, auto parts, cameras, TV, toys, food and bever whiles, tobacco and personal care products likewise being forge. Most all these products could be categorized under lavishness goods which most consumers savvyd as symbol of placement.Among the mold goods, lavishness intriguer shufflings have become targets of counterfeit manufacturing channels. Therefore, counterfeit of heightslife goods is increasing in a dramatic growth rate. For counterfeit manufacturers, this market is very m adeptymaking(a) as it is menial cost products that are easy to manufacture stance symbol and easy to sell with no marketing effort undeniable (Gentry et al., 2006).Counterfeiting has cause cast out consequences to the economy. As estimated by The International Anti Counterfeiting has ca utilize at to the lowest degree $200 billion per annum in lost job, taxes and sales. This is in addition an obstacle to t he training of intellectual properties. Therefore, there is a need to look into the issue from distinct perspectives to pr steadyt it from acquire worse.1.1 Problem StatementCounterfeit market is in growing rate although many another(prenominal) countries have implemented anti counterfeiting strategies to fit and eliminate this il sanctioned industry. However, studies were main(prenominal)ly focused on proviso side, including deter counterfeit through trademark registration, regulatory action and protection strategies to boil d feature the availability of counterfeits ( stool et al, 1995).Unfortunately, all the efforts exerted seem ineffective as it failed to deter the consumers from corrupt counterfeit goods. By referring to antecedent studies, people from distinguishable country or cultural background seem to have diametric circumstances towards barter for inclination of counterfeits. Therefore, to eradicate the bother, the factors that drive consumers in a speci fic nation halcyon to counterfeit lavishness products must(prenominal)iness be identified (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2007). Therefore, we must find out why consumer bribe counterfeit? hardly non where they demoralize (Wee et al, 1995).By far, there is limited inquiry on consumers situations toward counterfeits goods in Malaysia has been published. In fact, Malaysia has been listed on the IIPAs Priority curb List from year 2003 to 2006. In year 2010, IPPA has suggested to remain Malaysia in the watch List as the counterfeits issues getting worse. In order to regain a good written report to deplumate more international investors from luxury goods industry, g everyplacenment are urged to curb the counterfeits problem in Malaysia.Therefore, there is necessary to gain an insight into the main causes of the phenomenon of counterfeits in Malaysia. Particularly, we must understand Malaysian posts towards secure of counterfeits. Undoubtable, counte rfeits damaged at much cheaper than current, as lower production cost and lower forest. Consumers who un runingly to pay tall price for genuine products are enticed to secure counterfeits. Thus pecuniary motives lead be neglected in the investigation. Other antecedent motives of consumers postures should be examined as the analysis data may facilitate the marketing activities of genuine luxury brands in determining their effective countermeasures against counterfeiting. Meanwhile, there is critical to set the primal mechanism of plan to acquire luxury counterfeits.1.2 Objectives of the StudyThis subject area aims to slaver the motives becharm consumers attitudes towards bribe of luxury counterfeits. hypothesis of planned behavior was used as basis for theoretical framework development. Therefore relationship amongst three main factors attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral bid towards bargain for object of counterfeit pull up stakes be investig ated as thoroughly.Seven wants that entice consumers attitudes towards procure of luxury brands counterfeit have been identified through reexamine on previous studies. Motivation selected including status consumption, integrity, value sensibleness, personal comfort, change quest, materialism, brand conscious and product way. every last(predicate) these motivations will be investigated to identify the relationship betwixt each of the motivation with the consumers attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands and the purport to bargain for counterfeits of luxury brands.1.3 Significance of the StudyA review of previous look into has indicated a need for further investigation on the determinants of counterfeits procure purport. As according to Eisend M. and Schuchert-Gler, P.(2006), previous studies have failed so far to integrate their results systematically into a more general framework because of lack of pro constitute supposition. The study also stated that cu lture has been seen significantly influence the bargain for intention and behavior. Malaysia that consists of three main ethnic groups is expected to give a different result.1.4 Scope of the StudyIn this study, definition of counterfeiting is adopted from Eisend M. and Schuchert-Gler, P. (2006)Counterfeiting is mean that an master key product with a remarkable brand value worth write already exists on the market. Its characteristics are copied into some other product, which is indistinguishable from the original, and is sold at a lower price as if it were the original. Nevertheless consumers are well aware of the difference between the two products.Meanwhile, luxury goods outlined as products from four main categories fashion, perfumes and cosmetics, wines and spirits, watches and jewelry (Jackson, 2000).CHAPTER 2COUNTERFEIT MARKETCounterfeits were first found in luxury brands because of the high profit margin that provide attractive incentive to the manufacturing of counterfe it luxury brands. According to OECD (2008), a broad shift from luxury goods to common consumer goods was reported. Everything could be counterfeited, including star sign products, food and drinks, electronic devices, tobacco, books, toys, automobile parts, pesticides, cosmetics, tools, clothes and handbags to software and prescription drugs.Despite that other product categories are on the rise, the OECD (2008) has reported that luxury fashion items like accessories, clothing, jewellery and footwear still account for the largest part of counterfeit trade, which is up to 66,2% of all interventions by European Customs.2.1 Luxury Goods MarketAs stated by Preiholt, H. Hagg, C. (2006) development of luxury goods market was believed contributed by three main factors globalisation that facilitates more international designers to build up their worldwide reputation the increase number of luxury conglomerates that are striving towards jewellery, accessories, wine, perfumes and cosmetics a s complements to clothing. at last is the relational exchange was believed base on confidence and trust.Luxury goods market is in a dramatic growth rate. Luxury Institute had reported that luxury goods market has grown at a compounded two-digit rate in its 2008 luxury market report in past decade. According to the report, the phenomenon was attributed to three possibilities wealthy are purchasing more luxuries, there are greater number of wealthy people and the middle and lower classes are purchasing luxury brands. Koehn (2002) stated more people aspiring to own luxuries will corrupt luxuries more regularly than those economically affordable. This is due to consumers perceptions that luxury goods are symbol of status regardless of their economic situation (Vickers Renand, 2003). any(prenominal) buyers are seems to be voluntary to pay a high price for a high-profile brand.2.2 Counterfeit luxury brandsCounterfeits are goods that similar or uniform to genuine brands which like r eproduction of trademarked brands (Cordell et al, 1996) but without the authorities of genuine brands owner. Staake et al (2009) defined counterfeit trade as trade in goods that, be it due to their design, trademark, logo, or company name, bear without authorization a reference to a brand, a manufacturer, or any organization that warrants for the fibre or standard conformity of the goods in such a means that the counterfeit merchandise could, potentially, be confused with goods that rightfully use this reference.Staake et al (2009) also proposed to make a distinction with regard to consumers perception on counterfeits luxury brands. seek has identified two faces of consumption of counterfeits. The first type is consumer that acquired without aware of the intellectual property infringement (deceptive counterfeiting) or un knowingly and circumstantially corrupts the counterfeit that closely imitated the genuine brands (Staake et al 2009 Tom et al, 1998).Meanwhile another type i s non-deceptive counterfeit, where consumer willingly to purchase the counterfeits (Prendergast et al, 2002 Staake et al 2009). It can also been defined as consumers recognises that the product is not authentic according to specific knowledge cues such as price, purchase location or material used (Gentry et al, 2006). Consumers behaviour is different in these different cases.2.3 Counterfeit in MalaysiaIn Malaysia, counterfeits market is active since decade ago. As reported by IIPA in 2006, counterfeiting of fashion, pharmaceuticals, batteries, computer accessories, tobacco, mobile phone batteries, food, electronics, petroleum products and toys was problematic in Malaysia. Among all products, entertainment software has constituted to 91% of the counterfeit trade in year 2004, resulting in a loss of US$74 million for local records and music industry (IIPA, 2005). The research has even reported that Malaysia was appeared as the most infamous optical disc entertainment software produc er/ exporter in the world.Therefore Malaysia has remained on the Priority Watch List from year 2003 to 2006. In year 2008 and 2009, Malaysia has been removed from Watch-List but was suggested remain on Watch List in year 2010 as the issue remained problematic.Enforcement action was in declining since the removal of Malaysia from Watch-List. As a consequence, plagiarisation goods like CD and videodisc was re-emerged. Again, counterfeits were openly available in night markets that operating in different locations every night. Besides, counterfeits also available in fixed premises locations in Klang Valley, particularly in Bangsar, Sg Wang, Petaling Jaya, and Shah Alam Perangin Mall in Penang and Holiday Plaza in Johor Bahru (IIPA, 2010).Malaysian Government has collaborated with original vendor and local media in organising cognizance campaign in attempt to make public aware of the mischievousness of purchasing counterfeits. Unfortunately, all these efforts seem ineffective in dete r consumers from purchase of counterfeits. Therefore, in order to develop an effective policy, there is a must to look into the problem from different perspective, e redundantly demand side of counterfeit.CHAPTER 3LITERATURE REVIEWNumbers of study has been conducted to examine the emergence of counterfeit trade, from both supply and demand side. However focus was on the supply dimension in order to develop appropriate policy to turn back this illegal activity the factors that drive consumer demand for counterfeits should be identified (Kim, H Karpova, E., 2010).3.1 Counterfeits DemandThe dramatic increase of counterfeiting trade is driven by the high demand from consumers. Many consumers knowingly purchase counterfeits. OECD (2007) has grouped the factors that drive consumers towards knowingly demand for counterfeit and pirated goods into three principal categories first, is the characteristic of product imprimatur the man-to-man consumer, and lastly the institutional environmen t in which the soul consumer operates. All these factors as listed in Table 1 influencing consumers behaviour towards counterfeit.Among these three categories, consumer characteristics, including consumer financial status and attitudes towards counterfeits, will be the main disturb in this study.Besides, many studies have been conducting to evaluate consumers intention and willingness to purchase counterfeit products. Numbers of variables and determinants have been identified in previous research but results were differing for various products and brands, and also in different nation, as per listed in Table 2 which adopted and adapted from Eisend M. and Schuchert-Gler, P.(2006) Stake, T. et al. (2009).DescriptionAlbers-Miller 1999Survey among 92 US students selling price enkindles willingness to buy a counterfeit above all for those who prefer counterfeits over stolen products presence of friends who also buy an illicit good enhance willingness to buy, purchase alone precipita tes the willingness to buy perceived criminal risk has higher influence on buying stolen vs. counterfeit or genuine products.Ang et al. 2001Survey on 3251 Singaporean consumers cocksure correlation between attitude/ purchase intention negative influence of normative susceptibility, integrity and personal income on attitude towards plagiarization corroboratory influence of value consciousness on attitude towards piracy.Bian and Veloutson 2007Comparison of British and Chinese consumers who admit to have knowingly purchased counterfeit products. Demographic variables have not been found to significantly influence counterfeit demand. In both countries, consumers show a very low suasion on counterfeit products in general, but perceived their average choice as similar compared to non-logo productsBloch et al. 1993A espouse on 200 US adults at mall and flea market demographic variables did not distinguish between the choice groups less reliance on durability and brand take to has a arbitrary influence on the stated choice to purchase a counterfeit compared to purchasing a designer label or no logo apart form good value, all paygrade items scored higher for the designer label compared to the counterfeit self-image is partially significant, indicating that counterfeit consumers are less confident, successful, of lower status and less wealthy.Chang 1998Comparison of the validity of the theory of reasoned action (TRA) and the theory of planned behavior (TPB) as utilise to illegal copying of software. The results suggest that perceived behavioral control is a better predictor of behavioral intention than attitudeCheung and Prendergast 2006Survey on 1152 adult consumers in Hong Kong, Shanghai Wuhan middle and high income families, males, white grasp workers, people with tertiary knowledge, younger consumers and singles are more apt(predicate) to be heavy buyers of pirated clothing and accessories.Cordell Wongtada and Kieschnick 1996An experiment study on 221 business students in an Eastern metropolitan area attitude towards lawfulness negatively think to willingness to purchase a known counterfeit only for intertwine shirts expected performance confirmatory related to willingness to purchase known counterfeit for knit shirts and 35-mm camera branding and price concession controlling related to willingness to purchase a known counterfeit for low investment-at-risk (knit shirts) retailer prestigiousness positive related to willingness to purchase a known counterfeit for high investment-at-risk (camera).Gentry et al. 2001Qualitative study on 102 international students, predominantly Chinese subculture from Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia counterfeits are purchase because of the brands a a low-grade version with the intent to purchase the authentic product if trial is successful counterfeits are an unexceptionable compromise and offer lesser value for lesser cost counterfeits are purchased because they represent a brand (brand decis ion), not as a product decision counterfeits provide novelty and symbolize ones travel scrams for tourist consumers.hoe et al. 2003Qualitative study on 20 UK consumes aged under 30 consumers use counterfeits as substitute for required high value designer brands that help them to create their identities, to transfer the associated cultural meaning, and impress others but only as long as they can deceive the onlookerJenner and Artun 2005A survey on 202 German consumers in Turkey the perceived quality difference between counterfeits and genuine brand reduces purchase intention for all product categories (textiles, leather accessories, CDs, sofrware, watches, perfume)Kwong et al. 2003A survey on 306 consumers from Hong Kong attitude towards piracy influence purchase intentions female have lower purchase intentions, age is negatively related and past experience is positively related to intentions to buy pirated CDs.Parthasarathy and Mittelstaedt 1995Survey among 205 US students The wil lingness to engage in piracy to be strongly affected by the attitudes towards piracy, subjective norms, perceived utility of the software, and the willingness to seek help from others to reduce non-monetary cost. The opinion that the high prices of software are not warrant did not appear to affect piracy behavior.Peace et al. 2003Extension of the theory of reasoned action by a factor of perceived behavioral control as posited by the theory of reasoned action, and punishment foregone conclusion/severity. In a survey among 203 students, the model was able to explain 65% of variance in software piracy intention.Penz and Stttinger 2005A survey on 1040 Austrian consumers attitude towards counterfeiting and self-identity have a positive effect on purchase intentions, particularly at low price levels normative tweet and perceived behavioral control have a positive involve on purchase intentions at low and high price levels record traits influence attitude towards counterfeiting and su bjective norm price consciousness has no impact, access to counterfeits has a positive impact on purchase intentions purchase intentions predict purchase behaviorPhau et al. 2001Survey among 100 consumers in Hong Kong. Those who less often purchase counterfeit clothing are younger, have a lower disposable income, and are less well educatedPrendergast et al. 2002A survey on 200 consumers from Hong Kong quality and large supply enhances purchase intentions for high spenders compared to low spenders in case of VCDs quality, material and friends/ family opinion enhance purchase intentions for low spenders compared to high spenders in case of t-shirts for t-shirts, quality, popularity, ethical and legal issues are more consequential than for VCDs overall the richness of criteria do not differ for low and high spenders with price being the most chief(prenominal) criteria.Swee et al. 2001Survey among 3600 Asian consumers who buy counterfeit goods. Counterfeit consumers regard the purcha se of fakes as less risky and less unethical, are more value conscious, and have a lower average income compared to those who do not purchase counterfeit articles.Tom et al. 1998A survey on 435 US consumers impressiveness of style has a negative influence, sizeableness of price a positive influence on the preference for the counterfeit version of software importance of brand, function, durability has a negative influence, importance of price a positive influence on the preference for the counterfeit version of t-shirt importance of durability has a negative influence on the preference counterfeit purses age and income is negatively related, as is education with the preference for counterfeit versions of a product preference for counterfeit product leads to more positive attitudes towards counterfeiting and greater satisfaction with the price, but less satisfaction with durability and quality.Wang 2005A survey on 456 students from Taiwan cost benefit enhance the intention to purcha se a pirated DVD/VCD while performance risk, ethical concerns, and well-disposed norms decrease it.Wang et al. 2005A survey on 314 Chinese students positive influences of attitude towards piracy on purchase intention negative influence of normative susceptibility, positive influence of value consciousness, novelty want and collectivism on attitude towards piracy buyers have more positive attitudes towards piracy than non-buyers.Wee at al. 1995A survey on 949 students and working adults in South-East Asia attitude towards piracy is related to purchase intention for all counterfeit products brand status, materialism, novelty seeking, and risk-taking have no influence endeavor is related to purchase intentions for counterfeit literature and software quality is related to purchase intention for all counterfeit products perceived fashion content is related to purchase intention for counterfeit watches forcible appearance is related to purchase intention for leather wallets/ purses an d watches image and durability have no influence education is negatively related to purchase intention for all counterfeit products household income is negatively related to purchase intention for counterfeit leather wallets/ purses.Woolley and Veloutsou 2006 summary of purchasing frequencies and underlying antecedents of software piracy among US students. Results indicate that students understanding and knowledge of copyright laws have increased since 1991, but this knowledge has not influenced software piracy ratesSource Adopted and adapted from Eisend M. and Schuchert-Gler, P.(2006) Stake, T. et al. (2009)3.2 Theory of Planned behaviourAccording to the Theory of planned behaviour (Azjen, 1985), an individual behaviour is guided by three kinds of considerations attitudes toward behaviour, subjective norm and perceive behavioral control. In combination, these three considerations lead to the formation of a behavioural intention. Generally, a person who favourable towards the att itude and subjective norm, and with high level of perceived control, the stronger of his/her intention towards the behaviour. When opportunity arises, people are expected to stomach out their intention, thus intention is assumes as the immediate antecedent of behaviour.3.2.1 Attitude toward purchase intention of CounterfeitsAs per explained in Theory of Planned Behavior, consumers attitudes will direct influence their purchase intention and finally drive them toward purchase behavior. Past research has examined various motivations that influence the consumer purchase intention of counterfeit, including economic, quality, personality, social and ethical factors (Amatulli, C. Guido, G., 2011 Kim, H. Karpova, E., 2011 Kim, J. E. et al., 2009 Norum, P. S. Cuno, A., 2010 Perez, M. E. et. al, 2010 Phau, I et al., 2010 Phau, I. Teah, M., 2009).a. Status consumptionConsumers perceived luxury brands as symbol of status, where they purchase, use and consumed a goods which will display th eir distinctive status (Eastman et al., 1997). Status consumption has been investigated in many studies in different countries but showing different result (Amatulli, C. Guido, G., 2011 Kim, H. Karpova, E., 2009 Phau, I et al., 2010 Wee C. H. et. al., 1995).Status seeking consumers those with low affordability tend to purchase counterfeits of luxury brands to indulge their status seeking needs (Phau, I. Teah, M., 2009 Kim, H. Karpova, E., 2009 OECD, 2007). Luxury brands are used to project socioeconomic status, even though it is a counterfeit, consumer are hoping to convey their high society status that associated with genuine brand. Thus, the following hypothesis developedH1a Status consumption has a positive influence on consumer attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands.b. IntegrityIntegrity represents individual ethical consideration, self-control, responsibility and honesty that related to lawfulness (Wang et al., 2005). Research has found that consumers that are mor e lawful-minded consume negative attitudes towards counterfeits and less willing toward purchase of counterfeits (Cordell et al., 1996, Phau, I et al., 2009). This lead to the developed of hypothesis thatH1b Integrity has a negative influence on consumer attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands.c. measure out consciousnessConsumers would like to purchase a luxury brands that associated with value, prestige and benefits but they might not willing to pay a high price for it (Cordell et al, 1996). Consumers who are value conscious are different from consumers that are price consciousness that only concern for products price. They tend to maximize perceived utility or benefits to be acquired for their money.Consumers perceived that counterfeits have similar quality and function to genuine brands, thus they are more positive towards counterfeits which is much cheaper than genuine brands (Kim, H. Karpova, E., 2011 Phau, I. Teah, M., 2009). Therefore, this study propose thatH1c Value consciousness has a positive influence on consumers attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands.d. in-person GratificationPersonal gratification could be defined as the desire for self-accomplishment, social recognition and to enjoy finer things in life (Wang et al., 2005). Hence, consumers possess high personal gratification are conscious on products quality, appearance and trendiness. According to Bloch et al. (1993) counterfeits buyers perceived themselves to be less successful, less confident and low perceived status. Thus those with high personal gratification might have low aptness towards goods of inferior quality (Amatulli, C. Guido, G., 2011 Phau, I. Teah, M., 2009).Thus, this study proposed thatH1d Personal gratification has a negative influence on consumer attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands.e. Novelty pursuanceNovelty seeking consumers tend to try new and different brands to satisfy their curiosity (Wang et al, 2005). Counterfeits those in lowe r price may become their choices (Phau, I. Teah, M., 2009 Wee C. H. et. al., 1995).H1e Novelty seeking has a positive influence on consumer attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands.f. MaterialismFor consumers with high level of materialism or materialist, they view that contentment come from acquisition of possessions. They consume prefer consume status products than general products (Wong, 1997). As similar to status consumption, for those who would like to gain a special identity from others but without the financial capacity, counterfeits that perceived as lower-priced branded goods will become an alternative (Kim, H. Karpova, E., 2011 Phau, I et al., 2010 Wee C. H. et. al., 1995). Therefore,H1f Materialism has a positive influence on consumer attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands.g. Product AppearanceLuxury brands perpetually associate with fashion component thus product attributes play an important role in influencing consumer purchase intention. Consumers are willing to pay for physical attributes without paying for the associate quality (Cordell et al., 2006 Kim, H. Karpova, E., 2009). Physical will be one of the main concerns when consumers purchase a counterfeit (Wee C. H. et. al., 1995). Thus,H1g Product appearance has positive influence towards purchase intention of counterfeit luxury brands.Most of the previous research has suggest that attitudes toward behavior are more accurate in predicting intention to purchase behaviour. Thus we hypothesizeH2 Attitude towards counterfeit is positively influence the purchase intention of counterfeit luxury brands.3.2.2 Subjective norms towards purchase intention of CounterfeitsSubjective norms play an important role in influencing a behavior as people will share information, knowledge and experience with others. Consumer who has friends and family members who favourable in purchased counterfeits may influence them to have a tendency towards counterfeits. Thus,H3 Subjective norm is positive ly influence the purchase intention of counterfeit luxury brands.3.3.3 Perceived Behavioural ControlPerceived behavioral control reflects past experience, knowledge about products and expected obstacles. Consumers those think that their friends or family do not approve the possession of counterfeit goods may not carry out the behavior. Therefore,H4 Perceived behavioral control is positively influence the purchase intention of counterfeit luxury brands.CHAPTER 4RESEARCH METHODOLOGY4.1 Research DesignIntegration methodology will be utilized to investigate the research topics. Qualitative and numerical survey will be conducted in two phases. First phase, in depth interview will be conducted as complementarity research to confirm the context for theoretical model. Second deliver will be getting the conclusive data through quantitative survey.By far, most of the studies conducted are by quantitative research, limited soft research has been identified. Qualitative research is useful in exploring new elements and develops an initial understanding towards studied market (Amatulli, C Guido, G., 2010).4.2 Phase One In-depth audienceIntegration methodology was used in many research with purpose of exploring viewpoints in early stage of research (McCracken, 1998) or to enhance the descendent quantitative research to be conducted (Greene et al, 1989 259). Since there is limited research conducted in Malaysia, the main purpose is to gain initial understanding about consumers conceptuality of counterfeit luxury brands and to learn the language they used to describe it. Meanwhile, this research to be conducted to confirm the context for theoretical model developed based on previous studies. All finding hoped to support the motivations and factors that influencing purchase behaviour identified from literature review.4.2.1 Target GroupIn order to convey the data to cover the whole population, 30 respondents from different age and enkindle categories will be selected. Sel ection criteria will be as listed in Table 4.4.2.2 head words DesignResearch QuestionInterview QuestionQuestion 1To what extend are the relationship between Malaysian consumers motivation and attitudes toward counterfeits brand?What brands do you consider as luxury brands?Have you ever purchase a counterfeit o